You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heteronormativity and the Justification of Gender Hierarchy: Investigating the Archival Data From 16 European Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686974 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federico Ferrari, Chiara Imperato, Tiziana Mancini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,137,339
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,356
of 33,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,516
of 426,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#82
of 1,571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.