You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Sharing Economy and the Issue of (Dis)Trust
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689722 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva Hofmann, Barbara Hartl, Ann-Marie Ingrid Nienaber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 50% |
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,492,131
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,893
of 30,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,197
of 446,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#164
of 1,303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.