You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revisiting the Effects of Gender Diversity in Small Groups on Divergent Thinking: A Large-Scale Study Using Synchronous Electronic Brainstorming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurine Peter, Nicolas Michinov, Maud Besançon, Estelle Michinov, Jacques Juhel, Genavee Brown, Eric Jamet, Anthony Cherbonnier, ProFAN Consortium, Batruch Anatolia, Butera Fabrizio, Desrichard Olivier, Mella-Barraco Nathalie, Visintin Emilio Paolo, Brown Genavee, Bressan Marco, Poletti Céline, Régner Isabelle, Vives Eva, Bressoux Pascal, De Place Anne-Laure, Pansu Pascal, Riant Mathilde, Sanrey Camille, Cherbonnier Anthony, Goron Luc, Hemon Brivael, Jamet Eric, Michinov Estelle, Michinov Nicolas, Peter Laurine, Darnon Céline, Demolliens Marie, Huguet Pascal, Robert Anais, Stanczak Arnaud, Bouet Marinette, Cepeda Carlos, Ducros Théo, Martinez Ruben, Mazenod Vincent, Petitcollot Benoit, Toumani Farouk, Vilmin Simon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,695,543
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,182
of 34,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,523
of 441,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#445
of 1,588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.