You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disruption Leads to Methodological and Analytic Innovation in Developmental Sciences: Recommendations for Remote Administration and Dealing With Messy Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila Krogh-Jespersen, Leigha A. MacNeill, Erica L. Anderson, Hannah E. Stroup, Emily M. Harriott, Ewa Gut, Abigail Blum, Elveena Fareedi, Kaitlyn M. Fredian, Stephanie L. Wert, Lauren S. Wakschlag, Elizabeth S. Norton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 27% |
| Psychology | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,810,191
of 24,088,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#17,195
of 32,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,696
of 505,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#576
of 1,532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.