You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building a Networked Improvement Community: Lessons in Organizing to Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732347 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chelsea E. Noble, Marilyn J. Amey, Luis A. Colón, Jacqueline Conroy, Anna De Cheke Qualls, Kamla Deonauth, Jeffrey Franke, Alex Gardner, Bennett Goldberg, Thelma Harding, Gary Harris, Sara Xayarath Hernández, T. Lisa Holland-Berry, Omari Keeles, Barbara A. Knuth, Colleen M. McLinn, Judy Milton, Rudisang Motshubi, C. A. Ogilvie, Rosemary J. Perez, Sarah L. Rodriguez, Nancy Ruggeri, Panos S. Shiakolas, Arnold Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,342,428
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,203
of 30,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,071
of 510,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#165
of 1,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.