You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Delphi method on the positive impact of COVID-19 on higher education institutions: Perceptions of academics from Malaysia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013974 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mcxin Tee, Amran Rasli, Jason See Seong Kuan Toh, Imelda Hermilinda Abas, Fei Zhou, Cheng Siang Liew |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,954,297
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,261
of 30,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,134
of 440,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#474
of 1,853 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,853 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.