You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying the mixed-blessings model and labeling theory to stigma in inclusive education: An experimental study of student and trainee teachers’ perceptions of pupils with ADHD, DLD, and intellectual disability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910702 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Röhm, Michelle Grengel, Michélle Möhring, Johannes Zensen-Möhring, Cosima Nellen, Matthias R. Hastall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,482,318
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,081
of 30,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,672
of 440,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#306
of 1,859 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,859 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.