↓ Skip to main content

How culturally unique are pandemic effects? Evaluating cultural similarities and differences in effects of age, biological sex, and political beliefs on COVID impacts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How culturally unique are pandemic effects? Evaluating cultural similarities and differences in effects of age, biological sex, and political beliefs on COVID impacts
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucian Gideon Conway, Shailee R. Woodard, Alivia Zubrod, Marcela Tiburcio, Nora Angélica Martínez-Vélez, Angela Sorgente, Margherita Lanz, Joyce Serido, Rimantas Vosylis, Gabriela Fonseca, Žan Lep, Lijun Li, Maja Zupančič, Carla Crespo, Ana Paula Relvas, Kostas A. Papageorgiou, Foteini-Maria Gianniou, Tayler Truhan, Dara Mojtahedi, Sophie Hull, Caroline Lilley, Derry Canning, Esra Ulukök, Adnan Akın, Claudia Massaccesi, Emilio Chiappini, Riccardo Paracampo, Sebastian Korb, Magdalena Szaflarski, Almamy Amara Touré, Lansana Mady Camara, Aboubacar Sidiki Magassouba, Abdoulaye Doumbouya, Melis Mutlu, Zeynep Nergiz Bozkurt, Karolina Grotkowski, Aneta M. Przepiórka, Nadia Saraí Corral-Frías, David Watson, Alejandro Corona Espinosa, Marc Yancy Lucas, Francesca Giorgia Paleari, Kristina Tchalova, Amy J. P. Gregory, Talya Azrieli, Jennifer A. Bartz, Harry Farmer, Simon B. Goldberg, Melissa A. Rosenkranz, Jennifer Pickett, Jessica L. Mackelprang, Janessa M. Graves, Catherine Orr, Rozel Balmores-Paulino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Psychology 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,670,346
of 23,801,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,618
of 31,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,097
of 450,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#161
of 1,679 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,801,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,679 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.