↓ Skip to main content

Military tactical adaptive decision making during simulated military operational stress is influenced by personality, resilience, aerobic fitness, and neurocognitive function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Military tactical adaptive decision making during simulated military operational stress is influenced by personality, resilience, aerobic fitness, and neurocognitive function
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1102425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole M. Sekel, Meaghan E. Beckner, William R. Conkright, Alice D. LaGoy, Felix Proessl, Mita Lovalekar, Brian J. Martin, Leslie R. Jabloner, Alaska L. Beck, Shawn R. Eagle, Michael Dretsch, Peter G. Roma, Fabio Ferrarelli, Anne Germain, Shawn D. Flanagan, Christopher Connaboy, Amy J. Haufler, Bradley C. Nindl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,659,287
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,648
of 31,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,006
of 416,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#292
of 1,384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.