↓ Skip to main content

Taking stock of an idiom’s background assumptions: an alternative relevance theoretic account

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taking stock of an idiom’s background assumptions: an alternative relevance theoretic account
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1117847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ira A. Noveck, Nicholas Griffen, Diana Mazzarella

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,520,733
of 24,378,986 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#20,048
of 32,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,959
of 173,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#125
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,986 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.