You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The audience who knew too much: investigating the role of spontaneous theory of mind on the processing of dramatic irony scenes in film
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia Cabañas, Atsushi Senju, Tim J. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 30% |
| Psychology | 2 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,360,952
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,567
of 34,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,894
of 371,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#98
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.