You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantifying the efficacy of an automated facial coding software using videos of parents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Burgess, I. Culpin, I. Costantini, H. Bould, I. Nabney, R. M. Pearson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#484,154
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#979
of 33,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,638
of 334,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#4
of 827 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 827 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.