You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating conspiracy theories in the light of narrative persuasion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1288125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ines Adornetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,311,517
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,858
of 34,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,665
of 360,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#120
of 782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.