You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Neurophysiology of Auditory Hallucinations – A Historical and Contemporary Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Remko van Lutterveld, Iris E. C. Sommer, Judith M. Ford |
| Abstract |
Electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography are two techniques that distinguish themselves from other neuroimaging methodologies through their ability to directly measure brain-related activity and their high temporal resolution. A large body of research has applied these techniques to study auditory hallucinations. Across a variety of approaches, the left superior temporal cortex is consistently reported to be involved in this symptom. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that a failure in corollary discharge, i.e., a neural signal originating in frontal speech areas that indicates to sensory areas that forthcoming thought is self-generated, may underlie the experience of auditory hallucinations. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 20% |
| Psychology | 26 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,990,964
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,943
of 9,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,512
of 180,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.