You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder Comorbidity: Clinical Assessment and Therapeutic Implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00070 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefano Pallanti, Giacomo Grassi, Elisa Dinah Sarrecchia, Andrea Cantisani, Matteo Pellegrini |
| Abstract |
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder affecting approximately 1-3% of the population. OCD is probably an etiologically heterogeneous condition. Individuals with OCD frequently have additional psychiatric disorders concomitantly or at some time during their lifetime. Recently, some authors proposed an OCD sub-classification based on comorbidity. An important issue in assessing comorbidity is the fact that the non-response to treatment often involves the presence of comorbid conditions. Non-responsive patients are more likely to meet criteria for comorbid axis I or axis II disorders and the presence of a specific comorbid condition could be a distinguishing feature in OCD, with influence on the treatment adequacy and outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 80 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#345,980
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#199
of 11,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,399
of 186,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.