↓ Skip to main content

Correlations Between Awareness of Illness (Insight) and History of Addiction in Heroin-Addicted Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlations Between Awareness of Illness (Insight) and History of Addiction in Heroin-Addicted Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelo Giovanni Icro Maremmani, Luca Rovai, Fabio Rugani, Matteo Pacini, Francesco Lamanna, Silvia Bacciardi, Giulio Perugi, Joseph Deltito, Liliana Dell’Osso, Icro Maremmani

Abstract

In a group of 1066 heroin addicts, who were seeking treatment for opioid agonist treatment, we looked for differences in historical, demographic, and clinical characteristics, between patients with different levels of awareness of illness (insight). The results showed that, in the cohort studied, a majority of subjects lacked insight into their heroin-use behavior. Compared with the impaired-insight group, those who possessed insight into their illness showed significantly greater awareness of past social, somatic, and psychopathological impairments, and had a greater number of past treatment-seeking events for heroin addiction. In contrast with other psychiatric illnesses, the presence of awareness appears to be related to the passing of time and to the worsening of the illness. Methodologies to improve the insight of patients should, therefore, be targeted more directly on patients early in their history of heroin dependence, because the risk of lack of insight is greatest during this period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,171,608
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,096
of 9,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,815
of 244,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#34
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.