You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Statistics on Cannabis Users Skew Perceptions of Cannabis Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel M. Burns, Jonathan P. Caulkins, Susan S. Everingham, Beau Kilmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 30% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 87% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 21% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#530,172
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#301
of 12,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,843
of 292,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#12
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.