↓ Skip to main content

Addiction and the Brain-Disease Fallacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
90 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addiction and the Brain-Disease Fallacy
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Satel, Scott O. Lilienfeld

Abstract

From Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience by Sally Satel and Scott Lilienfeld, copyright © 2013. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books, a member of The Perseus Books Group. The notion that addiction is a "brain disease" has become widespread and rarely challenged. The brain-disease model implies erroneously that the brain is necessarily the most important and useful level of analysis for understanding and treating addiction. This paper will explain the limits of over-medicalizing - while acknowledging a legitimate place for medication in the therapeutic repertoire - and why a broader perspective on the problems of the addicted person is essential to understanding addiction and to providing optimal care. In short, the brain-disease model obscures the dimension of choice in addiction, the capacity to respond to incentives, and also the essential fact people use drugs for reasons (as consistent with a self-medication hypothesis). The latter becomes obvious when patients become abstinent yet still struggle to assume rewarding lives in the realm of work and relationships. Thankfully, addicts can choose to recover and are not helpless victims of their own "hijacked brains."

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 260 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 20%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 10%
Social Sciences 26 10%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 63 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#357,060
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#226
of 12,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,280
of 321,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.