↓ Skip to main content

A Triadic Neurocognitive Approach to Addiction for Clinical Interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Triadic Neurocognitive Approach to Addiction for Clinical Interventions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Noël, Damien Brevers, Antoine Bechara

Abstract

According to the triadic neurocognitive model of addiction to drugs (e.g., cocaine) and non-drugs (e.g., gambling), weakened "willpower" associated with these behaviors is the product of an abnormal functioning in one or more of three key neural and cognitive systems: (1) an amygdala-striatum dependent system mediating automatic, habitual, and salient behaviors; (2) a prefrontal cortex dependent system important for self-regulation and forecasting the future consequences of a behavior; and (3) an insula dependent system for the reception of interoceptive signals and their translation into feeling states (such as urge and craving), which in turn plays a strong influential role in decision-making and impulse control processes related to uncertainty, risk, and reward. The described three-systems account for poor decision-making (i.e., prioritizing short-term consequences of a decisional option) and stimulus-driven actions, thus leading to a more elevated risk for relapse. Finally, this article elaborates on the need for "personalized" clinical model-based interventions targeting interactions between implicit processes, interoceptive signaling, and supervisory function aimed at helping individuals become less governed by immediate situations and automatic pre-potent responses, and more influenced by systems involved in the pursuit of future valued goals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 180 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 40%
Neuroscience 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,547,874
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#910
of 12,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,784
of 294,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#31
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.