You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Trauma of Peer Abuse: Effects of Relational Peer Victimization and Social Anxiety Disorder on Physiological and Affective Reactions to Social Exclusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Iffland, Lisa Margareta Sansen, Claudia Catani, Frank Neuner |
| Abstract |
Social exclusion elicits emotional distress, negative mood, and physiological stress. Recent studies showed that these effects were more intense and persisting in socially anxious subjects. The present study examined whether the abnormal reactions of socially anxious subjects can be traced back to previous experiences of relational peer victimization during childhood and adolescence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 79 | 53% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,109,627
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,666
of 10,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,437
of 244,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.