↓ Skip to main content

Agitation Predicts Response of Depression to Botulinum Toxin Treatment in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agitation Predicts Response of Depression to Botulinum Toxin Treatment in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Axel Wollmer, Nadeem Kalak, Stefanie Jung, Claas de Boer, Michelle Magid, Jason S. Reichenberg, Serge Brand, Edith Holsboer-Trachsler, Tillmann H. C. Kruger

Abstract

In a randomized, controlled trial (n = 30), we showed that botulinum toxin injection to the glabellar region produces a marked improvement in the symptoms of major depression. We hypothesized that the mood-lifting effect was mediated by facial feedback mechanisms. Here we assessed if agitation, which may be associated with increased dynamic psychomotor activity of the facial musculature, can predict response to the treatment. To test this hypothesis, we re-analyzed the data of the scales from our previous study on a single item basis and compared the baseline scores in the agitation item (item 9) of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) between responders (n = 9) and participants who did not attain response (n = 6) among the recipients of onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 15). Responders had significantly higher item 9 scores at baseline [1.56 + 0.88 vs. 0.33 + 0.52, t (13) = 3.04, d = 1.7, p = 0.01], while no other single item of the HAM-D or the Beck Depression Inventory was associated with treatment response. The agitation score had an overall precision of 78% in predicting response in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the curve, AUC = 0.87). These data provide a link between response to botulinum toxin treatment with a psychomotor manifestation of depression and thereby indirect support of the proposed facial feedback mechanism of action. Moreover, it suggests that patients with agitated depression may particularly benefit from botulinum toxin treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Psychology 11 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,173,958
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,785
of 9,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,643
of 226,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.