You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of Environmental Confounding in the Association between FKBP5 and First-Episode Psychosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olesya Ajnakina, Susana Borges, Marta Di Forti, Yogen Patel, Xiaohui Xu, Priscilla Green, Simona A. Stilo, Anna Kolliakou, Poonam Sood, Tiago Reis Marques, Anthony S. David, Diana Prata, Paola Dazzan, John Powell, Carmine Pariante, Valeria Mondelli, Craig Morgan, Robin M. Murray, Helen L. Fisher, Conrad Iyegbe |
| Abstract |
Failure to account for the etiological diversity that typically occurs in psychiatric cohorts may increase the potential for confounding as a proportion of genetic variance will be specific to exposures that have varying distributions in cases. This study investigated whether minimizing the potential for such confounding strengthened the evidence for a genetic candidate currently unsupported at the genome-wide level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,064
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,813
of 9,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,417
of 204,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#45
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.