You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hyperactivity and Motoric Activity in ADHD: Characterization, Assessment, and Intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caterina Gawrilow, Jan Kühnhausen, Johanna Schmid, Gertraud Stadler |
| Abstract |
The aim of the present literature review is threefold. (1) We will review theories, models, and studies on symptomatic hyperactivity and motoric activity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). (2) Another focus will be on assessment methods that have been proven to be effective in the detection of hyperactivity and motoric activity in children, adolescents, and adults with and without ADHD and emerging areas of research in the field of ADHD. We will compare subjective methods (i.e., rating scales) and objective methods (i.e., accelerometers). (3) Finally, physical activity intervention studies aiming at a modification of activity and overactive behavior will be summarized that seem to be promising candidates for alleviating hyperactivity symptoms in children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,564,657
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,923
of 10,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,547
of 365,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#23
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.