You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NIDA Clinical Trials Network Common Data Elements Initiative: Advancing Big-Data Addictive-Disorders Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Udi E. Ghitza, Robert E. Gore-Langton, Robert Lindblad, Betty Tai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Librarian | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,804,483
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,039
of 9,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,970
of 256,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.