↓ Skip to main content

Eliminating the Attentional Blink through Binaural Beats: A Case for Tailored Cognitive Enhancement

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eliminating the Attentional Blink through Binaural Beats: A Case for Tailored Cognitive Enhancement
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan A. Reedijk, Anne Bolders, Lorenza S. Colzato, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

Enhancing human cognitive performance is a topic that continues to spark scientific interest. Studies into cognitive-enhancement techniques often fail to take inter-individual differences into account, however, which leads to underestimation of the effectiveness of these techniques. The current study investigated the effect of binaural beats, a cognitive-enhancement technique, on attentional control in an attentional blink (AB) task. As predicted from a neurocognitive approach to cognitive control, high-frequency binaural beats eliminated the AB, but only in individuals with low spontaneous eye-blink rates (indicating low striatal dopamine levels). This suggests that the way in which cognitive-enhancement techniques, such as binaural beats, affect cognitive performance depends on inter-individual differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 30%
Neuroscience 20 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Engineering 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#894,698
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#465
of 10,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,391
of 269,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.