↓ Skip to main content

Cortico-Cerebellar Connectivity in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know So Far?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortico-Cerebellar Connectivity in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know So Far?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Crippa, Giuseppe Del Vecchio, Silvia Busti Ceccarelli, Maria Nobile, Filippo Arrigoni, Paolo Brambilla

Abstract

Although the Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is renowned to be a connectivity disorder and a condition characterized by cerebellar involvement, the connectivity between the cerebellum and other cortical brain regions is particularly underexamined. Indeed, converging evidence has recently suggested that the cerebellum could play a key role in the etiopathogenesis of ASD, since cerebellar anomalies have been consistently reported in ASD from the molecular to the behavioral level, and damage to the cerebellum early in development has been linked with signs of autistic features. In addition, current data have shown that the cerebellum is a key structure not only for sensory-motor control, but also for "higher functions," such as social cognition and emotion, through its extensive connections with cortical areas. The disruption of these circuits could be implicated in the wide range of autistic symptoms that the term "spectrum" connotes. In this review, we present and discuss the recent findings from imaging studies that investigated cortico-cerebellar connectivity in people with ASD. The literature is still too limited to allow for definitive conclusions; however, this brief review reveals substantial areas for future studies, underlining currently unmet research perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 20%
Psychology 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,248,391
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,686
of 9,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,852
of 298,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#39
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.