↓ Skip to main content

Tapping onto the Potential of Smartphone Applications for Psycho-Education and Early Intervention in Addictions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tapping onto the Potential of Smartphone Applications for Psycho-Education and Early Intervention in Addictions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melvyn W. B. Zhang, Roger C. M. Ho

Abstract

E-health, and in particular smartphone-based technology, is increasingly becoming commonplace in healthcare. While psychiatry has tapped onto these innovations for conditions, such as affective disorders, and schizophrenia and psychosis, the usage of these technologies in addiction is limited. Addiction psychiatry could harness the potential of smartphone technologies. Given the increasing incidences of substance-related problems globally, and along with the normalization of the general public's perspectives toward substances, and also in consideration of unwillingness for at-risk individuals in seeking help, the authors hope to illustrate how these issues could potentially be solved using E-health and technological innovations. The objectives of the current perspective article are to illustrate how recent advances in smartphone-based technologies could help in terms of psycho-education, as well as in helping individuals who are at-risk users in seeking help earlier. The authors aim to illustrate how the above are possible, building on existing theory-driven framework that has been extensively reviewed in the previous literature. Limitations with regard to the implementation of such technologies will also be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Psychology 22 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Computer Science 10 8%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,252,924
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,689
of 9,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,084
of 326,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#42
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.