↓ Skip to main content

Cell-Phone Addiction: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 12,884)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
40 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
454 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
976 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell-Phone Addiction: A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00175
Pubmed ID
Authors

José De-Sola Gutiérrez, Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca, Gabriel Rubio

Abstract

We present a review of the studies that have been published about addiction to cell phones. We analyze the concept of cell-phone addiction as well as its prevalence, study methodologies, psychological features, and associated psychiatric comorbidities. Research in this field has generally evolved from a global view of the cell phone as a device to its analysis via applications and contents. The diversity of criteria and methodological approaches that have been used is notable, as is a certain lack of conceptual delimitation that has resulted in a broad spread of prevalent data. There is a consensus about the existence of cell-phone addiction, but the delimitation and criteria used by various researchers vary. Cell-phone addiction shows a distinct user profile that differentiates it from Internet addiction. Without evidence pointing to the influence of cultural level and socioeconomic status, the pattern of abuse is greatest among young people, primarily females. Intercultural and geographical differences have not been sufficiently studied. The problematic use of cell phones has been associated with personality variables, such as extraversion, neuroticism, self-esteem, impulsivity, self-identity, and self-image. Similarly, sleep disturbance, anxiety, stress, and, to a lesser extent, depression, which are also associated with Internet abuse, have been associated with problematic cell-phone use. In addition, the present review reveals the coexistence relationship between problematic cell-phone use and substance use such as tobacco and alcohol.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 976 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 974 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 152 16%
Student > Master 122 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 8%
Researcher 62 6%
Student > Postgraduate 48 5%
Other 172 18%
Unknown 343 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 179 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 112 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 6%
Social Sciences 49 5%
Computer Science 37 4%
Other 168 17%
Unknown 372 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 400. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#76,667
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#41
of 12,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,675
of 322,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.