↓ Skip to main content

Social Phobia Is Associated with Delayed Onset of Chickenpox, Measles, and Mumps Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Phobia Is Associated with Delayed Onset of Chickenpox, Measles, and Mumps Infections
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross, Aleksandra Aleksandrowicz, Stephanie Rodgers, Mario Müller, Wolfram Kawohl, Wulf Rössler, Enrique Castelao, Caroline Vandeleur, Roland von Känel, Margot Mutsch, Roselind Lieb, Martin Preisig

Abstract

Evidence showing that infectious diseases in childhood play an important role in the etiopathogenesis of neurodevelopmental and other mental disorders is growing. The aim of this study was to explore the timing of common childhood diseases in early-onset anxiety disorders. We analyzed data from PsyCoLaus, a large Swiss Population Cohort Study (N = 3720). In this study, we regressed overanxious disorder, separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, and specific phobias on the age of onset of several childhood diseases, always adjusting for the other anxiety disorders listed above and for sex. The timing of viral childhood diseases (chickenpox, measles, and mumps) was consistently delayed in social phobia, notably both in men and women. We found no evidence for a reversed sequence of onset of phobia symptoms before that of the infections included. Social phobia was the only early anxiety disorder to show an association with a delayed onset of common viral childhood diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#19,672,928
of 25,050,563 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,271
of 12,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,547
of 432,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#48
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,050,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.