You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychological Factors and Alcohol Use in Problematic Mobile Phone Use in the Spanish Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José De-Sola, Hernán Talledo, Gabriel Rubio, Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca |
| Abstract |
This research aims to study the existing relationships among the factors of state anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and alcohol consumption regarding problematic mobile phone use, as assessed by the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. The study was conducted among 1,126 participants recruited among the general Spanish population, aged 16-65 years, by assessing the predictive value of these variables regarding this problematic use. Initially tobacco use was also considered being subsequently refused because of the low internal consistency of the scale used. In general terms, the results show that this problematic use is mainly related to state anxiety and impulsivity, through the dimensions of Positive and Negative Urgency. Considering its predictive value, multiple regression analysis reveals that state anxiety, positive and negative urgency, and alcohol consumption may predict problematic mobile phone use, ruling out the influence of depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 27% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,148,757
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#586
of 10,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,087
of 420,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#8
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.