↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Trauma and Stressful Life Events among Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Trauma and Stressful Life Events among Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danessa Mayo, Sarah Corey, Leah H. Kelly, Seghel Yohannes, Alyssa L. Youngquist, Barbara K. Stuart, Tara A. Niendam, Rachel L. Loewy

Abstract

The experience of childhood trauma (CT) and stressful life events (SLEs) is associated with subsequent development of a variety of mental health conditions, including psychotic illness. Recent research identifying adolescents and young adults at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis allows for prospective evaluation of the impact of trauma and adverse life events on psychosis onset and other outcomes, addressing etiological questions that cannot be answered in studies of fully psychotic or non-clinical populations. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current emerging literature on trauma and adverse life events in the CHR population. Up to 80% of CHR youth endorse a lifetime history of childhood traumatic events and victimization (e.g., bullying). Several studies have shown that the experience of CT predicts psychosis onset among CHR individuals, while the literature on the influence of recent SLEs (e.g., death of a loved one) remains inconclusive. Multiple models have been proposed to explain the link between trauma and psychosis, including the stress-vulnerability and stress-sensitivity hypotheses, with emphases on both cognitive processes and neurobiological mechanisms (e.g., the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis). Despite the preponderance of CHR individuals who endorse either CT or SLEs, no clinical trials have been conducted evaluating interventions for trauma in CHR youth to date. Furthermore, the current process of formal identification and assessment of trauma, SLEs, and their impact on CHR youth is inconsistent in research and clinical practice. Recommendations for improving trauma assessment, treatment, and future research directions in the CHR field are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 342 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 118 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 9%
Neuroscience 21 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 140 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#521,877
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#268
of 10,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,995
of 310,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.