↓ Skip to main content

The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 12,872)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
108 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
99 Google+ users
video
23 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
984 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Temple, Christophe Bernard, Steven E. Lipshultz, Jason D. Czachor, Joslyn A. Westphal, Miriam A. Mestre

Abstract

Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychoactive drug in the world. Natural sources of caffeine include coffee, tea, and chocolate. Synthetic caffeine is also added to products to promote arousal, alertness, energy, and elevated mood. Over the past decade, the introduction of new caffeine-containing food products, as well as changes in consumption patterns of the more traditional sources of caffeine, has increased scrutiny by health authorities and regulatory bodies about the overall consumption of caffeine and its potential cumulative effects on behavior and physiology. Of particular concern is the rate of caffeine intake among populations potentially vulnerable to the negative effects of caffeine consumption: pregnant and lactating women, children and adolescents, young adults, and people with underlying heart or other health conditions, such as mental illness. Here, we review the research into the safety and safe doses of ingested caffeine in healthy and in vulnerable populations. We report that, for healthy adults, caffeine consumption is relatively safe, but that for some vulnerable populations, caffeine consumption could be harmful, including impairments in cardiovascular function, sleep, and substance use. We also identified several gaps in the literature on which we based recommendations for the future of caffeine research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 984 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 984 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 235 24%
Student > Master 97 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 5%
Researcher 41 4%
Other 38 4%
Other 127 13%
Unknown 399 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 6%
Sports and Recreations 42 4%
Chemistry 39 4%
Other 215 22%
Unknown 423 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 620. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#36,682
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#21
of 12,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#703
of 328,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.