↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study of Possible Easy-to-Use Electrophysiological Index for Early Detection of Antidepressive Treatment Non-Response

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Pilot Study of Possible Easy-to-Use Electrophysiological Index for Early Detection of Antidepressive Treatment Non-Response
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goded Shahaf, Shahak Yariv, Boaz Bloch, Uri Nitzan, Aviv Segev, Alon Reshef, Yuval Bloch

Abstract

The evaluation of response to pharmacological treatment in MDD requires 4-8 weeks. Therefore, the ability to predict response, and especially lack of response to treatment, as early as possible after treatment onset or change, is of prime significance. Many studies have demonstrated significant results regarding the ability to use EEG and ERP markers, including attention-associated markers such as P300, for early prediction of response to treatment. But these markers are derived from long EEG/ERP samples, often from multiple channels, which render them impractical for frequent sampling. We developed a new electrophysiological attention-associated marker from a single channel (two electrodes), using 1-min samples with auditory oddball stimuli. This work presents an initial evaluation of the ability to use this marker's dynamics between repetitive measures for early (<2 weeks) differentiation between responders and non-responders to antidepressive treatment, in 26 patients with various levels of depression and heterogeneous treatment interventions. The slope of change in the marker between early consecutive samples was negative in the non-responders, but not in the responders. This differentiation was stronger for patients suffering from severe depression (p < 0.001). This pilot study supports the feasibility of the EEG marker for early recognition of treatment-resistant depression. If verified in large-scale prospective studies, it can contribute to research and clinical work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 6 14%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,399,600
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,544
of 10,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,370
of 315,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#55
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.