You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Android Robot-Mediated Mock Job Interview Sessions for Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hirokazu Kumazaki, Zachary Warren, Blythe A. Corbett, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Yoshio Matsumoto, Haruhiro Higashida, Teruko Yuhi, Takashi Ikeda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Mitsuru Kikuchi |
| Abstract |
The feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an android robot-mediated mock job interview training in terms of both bolstering self-confidence and reducing biological levels of stress in comparison to a psycho-educational approach human interview was assessed in a randomized study. Young adults (ages 18-25 years) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were randomized to participate either in a mock job interview training with our android robot system (n = 7) or a self-paced review of materials about job-interviewing skills (n = 8). Baseline and outcome measurements of self-reported performance/efficacy and salivary cortisol were obtained after a mock job interview with a human interviewer. After training sessions, individuals with ASD participating in the android robot-mediated sessions reported marginally improved self-confidence and demonstrated significantly lower levels of salivary cortisol as compared to the control condition. These results provide preliminary support for the feasibility and efficacy of android robot-mediated learning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,857,660
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,474
of 10,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,611
of 316,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#41
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.