You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation Intention for Initiating Intuitive Eating and Active Embodiment in Obese Patients Using a Smartphone Application
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damien Brevers, Anne Rogiers, Alexis Defontaine, Guy Cheron, Anne-Marie Clarinval, Jennifer Foucart, Anne Bouchez, Véronique Bolly, Laura Tsartsafloudakis, Pénélope Jottrand, Pierre Minner, Antoine Bechara, Charles Kornreich, Paul Verbanck |
| Abstract |
This article describes a study protocol, which aims to explore and describe the feasibility of a mobile-phone application for initiating intuitive eating and intuitive exercising in patients who are following an ambulatory treatment for obesity. Intuitive eating refers to one's ability to make food choices based on one's awareness of his/her body's response. Intuitive exercising encourages people in finding enjoyable ways of being physically active. These two components will be trained using an implementation intention procedure, that is, behavioral plans that aim at creating a strong link between a specified situation and a response. We aim to recruit up to 80 overweight and obese patients over a period of 2 years. The smartphone application will be assessed on the basis of (i) data obtained through a 4-week use period, (ii) self-report measures taken before and after the use of the mobile application, and (iii) feedbacks from participants after the use of the mobile application. This pilot study will allow us to better understand the applicability of the use of mobile application within ambulatory treatment settings, and to adapt the design of the app necessary for building cross-sectional studies investigating its efficacy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,834
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,347
of 10,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,056
of 437,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#40
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.