↓ Skip to main content

Levels of Social Sharing and Clinical Implications for Severe Social Withdrawal in Patients with Personality Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Levels of Social Sharing and Clinical Implications for Severe Social Withdrawal in Patients with Personality Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Livia Colle, Giovanni Pellecchia, Fabio Moroni, Antonino Carcione, Giuseppe Nicolò, Antonio Semerari, Michele Procacci

Abstract

Social sharing capacities have attracted attention from a number of fields of social cognition and have been variously defined and analyzed in numerous studies. Social sharing consists in the subjective awareness that aspects of the self's experience are held in common with other individuals. The definition of social sharing must take a variety of elements into consideration: the motivational element, the contents of the social sharing experience, the emotional responses it evokes, the behavioral outcomes, and finally, the circumstances and the skills which enable social sharing. The primary objective of this study is to explore some of the diverse forms of human social sharing and to classify them according to levels of complexity. We identify four different types of social sharing, categorized according to the nature of the content being shared and the complexity of the mindreading skills required. The second objective of this study is to consider possible applications of this graded model of social sharing experience in clinical settings. Specifically, this model may support the development of graded, focused clinical interventions for patients with personality disorders characterized by severe social withdrawal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Postgraduate 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 47%
Unspecified 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,346,991
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,981
of 12,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,106
of 447,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#40
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.