You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies: Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00275 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael P. Hengartner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 237 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 32 | 14% |
| United States | 29 | 12% |
| Canada | 11 | 5% |
| Australia | 10 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Panama | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 118 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 182 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 11% |
| Scientists | 20 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#147,383
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#105
of 12,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,146
of 448,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.