↓ Skip to main content

Semantic Memory Organization in Japanese Patients With Schizophrenia Examined With Category Fluency

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Semantic Memory Organization in Japanese Patients With Schizophrenia Examined With Category Fluency
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chika Sumiyoshi, Haruo Fujino, Tomiki Sumiyoshi, Yuka Yasuda, Hidenaga Yamamori, Michiko Fujimoto, Ryota Hashimoto

Abstract

Disorganization of semantic memory in patients with schizophrenia has been studied by referring to their category fluency performance. Recently, data-mining techniques such as singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis have been reported to be effective in elucidating the latent semantic memory structure in patients with schizophrenia. The aim of this study is to investigate semantic memory organization in patients with schizophrenia using a novel method based on data-mining approach. Category fluency data were collected from 181 patients with schizophrenia and 335 healthy controls at the Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University. The 20 most frequently reported animals were chosen for SVD analysis. In the two-dimensional (2D) solution, item vectors (i.e., animal names) were plotted in the 2D space of each group. In the six-dimensional (6D) solution, inter-item similarities (i.e., cosines) were calculated among items. Cosine charts were also created for the six most frequent items to show the similarities to other animal items. In the 2D spatial representation, the six most frequent items were grouped in the same clusters (i.e.,dog, catas pet cluster,lion, tigeras wild/carnivorous cluster, andelephant, giraffeas wild/herbivorous cluster) for patients and healthy adults. As for 6D spatial cosines, the correlations (Pearson'sr) between 17 items commonly generated in the two groups were moderately high. However, cosine charts created for the three pairs from the six most frequent animals (dog-cat, lion-tiger, elephant-giraffe) showed that pair-wise similarities between other animals were less salient in patients with schizophrenia. Semantic memory organization in patients with schizophrenia, revealed by SVD analysis, did not appear to be seriously impaired in the 2D space representation, maintaining a clustering structure similar to that in healthy controls for common animals. However, the coherence of those animals was less salient in 6D space, lacking pair-wise similarities to other members of the animal category. These results suggests subtle but structural differences between the two groups. A data-mining approach by means of SVD analysis seems to be effective in evaluating semantic memory in patients with schizophrenia, providing both a visual representation and an objective measure of the structural alterations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Psychology 7 14%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Mathematics 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 20 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,482
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,200
of 10,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,511
of 332,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#135
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.