You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions for Attenuated Positive Psychotic Symptoms in Individuals at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathy Davies, Joaquim Radua, Andrea Cipriani, Daniel Stahl, Umberto Provenzani, Philip McGuire, Paolo Fusar-Poli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 43% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,265,084
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,368
of 12,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,216
of 344,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#40
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.