You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Culture and Psychopathology: New Perspectives on Research, Practice, and Clinical Training in a Globalized World
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00366 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Moleiro |
| Abstract |
The present paper discusses the role of culture in understanding and treating psychopathology. It describes new perspectives on the conceptualization of psychopathology and on the definition of culture, and how these are intertwined. The impacts of culture, explicit and implicit discrimination, and minority stress on mental health are reviewed, especially in the current era. Culturally-sensitive assessment practices in psychopathology are emphasized, including addressing the multiple cultural identities of the patient, the explanatory models of the experienced distress, specific psychosocial stressors and strengths, and the cultural features of the practitioner-patient relationship in the clinical encounter. The particular case of psychotherapy in working with culturally diverse patients is explored. Finally, mainstreaming of culture in research and clinical training in psychopathology is highlighted, acknowledging that each clinical interaction is a cultural one. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| India | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 7 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,399,509
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#838
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,967
of 341,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#22
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.