You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Hypomania on Aerobic Capacity and Cardiopulmonary Functioning—A Case Report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00729 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aura Shoval, Hilary F. Armstrong, Julia Vakhrusheva, Jacob S. Ballon, Matthew N. Bartels, David Kimhy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Brazil | 1 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 9 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,325,665
of 24,876,519 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,949
of 12,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,988
of 446,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#94
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,876,519 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.