↓ Skip to main content

Decision-Making Deficits Are Associated With Learning Impairments in Female College Students at High Risk for Anorexia Nervosa: Iowa Gambling Task and Prospect Valence Learning Model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-Making Deficits Are Associated With Learning Impairments in Female College Students at High Risk for Anorexia Nervosa: Iowa Gambling Task and Prospect Valence Learning Model
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eunchan Na, Bitna Kang, Myung-Sun Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,550,733
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#7,879
of 10,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,964
of 437,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#181
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.