↓ Skip to main content

Glutamatergic Dysfunction and Glutamatergic Compounds for Major Psychiatric Disorders: Evidence From Clinical Neuroimaging Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glutamatergic Dysfunction and Glutamatergic Compounds for Major Psychiatric Disorders: Evidence From Clinical Neuroimaging Studies
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00767
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Ta Li, Kai-Chun Yang, Wei-Chen Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Other 12 5%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 80 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 31 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Psychology 22 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 89 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#4,288
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,952
of 446,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#113
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.