You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical and Experimental Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Neurofeedback in ADHD: A Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aurore Bussalb, Marco Congedo, Quentin Barthélemy, David Ojeda, Eric Acquaviva, Richard Delorme, Louis Mayaud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Denmark | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,113,716
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,113
of 10,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,968
of 353,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#65
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.