You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility Randomised Trial Comparing Two Forms of Mental Health Supported Accommodation (Supported Housing and Floating Outreach); a Component of the QuEST (Quality and Effectiveness of Supported Tenancies) Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Killaspy, Stefan Priebe, Peter McPherson, Zohra Zenasni, Paul McCrone, Sarah Dowling, Isobel Harrison, Joanna Krotofil, Christian Dalton-Locke, Rose McGranahan, Maurice Arbuthnott, Sarah Curtis, Gerard Leavey, Rob MacPherson, Sandra Eldridge, Michael King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 50% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,840,656
of 24,713,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,606
of 11,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,142
of 356,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#52
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,713,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.