You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preventing and Reducing Coercive Measures—An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Safewards Model in Two Locked Wards in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johanna Baumgardt, Dorothea Jäckel, Heike Helber-Böhlen, Nicole Stiehm, Karin Morgenstern, Andre Voigt, Enrico Schöppe, Ann-Kathrin Mc Cutcheon, Edwin Emilio Velasquez Lecca, Michael Löhr, Michael Schulz, Andreas Bechdolf, Stefan Weinmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,232,786
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,364
of 12,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,747
of 365,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#42
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.