You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anorexia Nervosa, Autism, and the ADOS: How Appropriate Is the New Algorithm in Identifying Cases?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00507 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicity Sedgewick, Jess Kerr-Gaffney, Jenni Leppanen, Kate Tchanturia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 63% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 30% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,770,767
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,069
of 12,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,681
of 361,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#32
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.