You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Works and What Doesn’t Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00759 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Garrido, Chris Millington, Daniel Cheers, Katherine Boydell, Emery Schubert, Tanya Meade, Quang Vinh Nguyen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Russia | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 517 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 11% |
| Researcher | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 82 | 16% |
| Unknown | 206 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 108 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 72 | 14% |
| Unknown | 221 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,736,613
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,641
of 12,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,516
of 378,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#37
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.