↓ Skip to main content

Differences Between Self-Reported Psychotic Experiences, Clinically Relevant Psychotic Experiences, and Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms in the General Population

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences Between Self-Reported Psychotic Experiences, Clinically Relevant Psychotic Experiences, and Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms in the General Population
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00782
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tais Silveira Moriyama, Jim van Os, Ary Gadelha, Pedro Mario Pan, Giovanni Abrahão Salum, Gisele Gus Manfro, Jair de Jesus Mari, Eurípedes Constantino Miguel, Luis Augusto Rohde, Guilherme Vanoni Polanczyk, Philip McGuire, Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan, Marjan Drukker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Unspecified 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Psychology 12 17%
Unspecified 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,565,210
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#6,015
of 12,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,455
of 370,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#137
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.