You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A “Necessary Evil”: Staff Perspectives of Soft Restraint Kit Use in a High-Security Hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00357 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Walker, Lindsay Tulloch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,942,934
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,475
of 10,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,515
of 389,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#101
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.